Fussach: Der Einsatzleiter erinnert sich

Im Nachlass des langjährigen Vorarlberer Landesgendarmeriekommandanten, General Alois Patsch, fand ich eine verstaubte Videokassette, die sich nach Umspielen auf zeitgemässe Technik als historisches Dokument entpuppte. 

Hier der Film (knapp 30 min):

Luis, frisch und munter wie er leibt und lebt, spricht frei von der Leber weg über die  Sternstunde des Föderalismus schlechthin in der neueren österreichischen Geschichte.

Unglücklicherweise hat der Interviewer genau dann abgebrochen, als die Aufarbeitung der ganzen Story in Wien zur Sprache kam. Nun kann man Luis hierzu traurigerweise nicht mehr befragen – sondern allenfalls noch das Staatsarchiv.

Geldschöpfung für Dummies

Geldschöpfung für Dummies

…ob die ständige Geldschöpfung gut ist, werden wir ja noch sehen… (Die Initiative basierte aber jedenfalls auf falschen Vorstellungen, da sind die Fehler der Bundeskanzlei vergleichsweise harmlos)

Oh mia patria, si bella e perduta…                                  

Verdi, Gefangenenchor aus Nabucco

So einfach ist das angeblich, da gibts zwei Methoden: Erstens – eine Bank vergibt Einlagen  ihrer Kunden an andere Kunden als Kredit. Zweitens: Die freche Bank “schafft” Geld, indem sie Kunden auf deren Kreditkonto cool Gutschriften erteilt.

Am nächsten Tag will der Kunde (im zweiten Fall) das Geld wegüberweisen (etwa zum Autohändler), das geht meist über das SIC (Interbanken-Clearing) der Nationalbank. Nur ist das SIC-Konto der Bank bei der SNB leer… die Bank, die grundlos Gutschriften erteilt, ist bald mal pleite. Daran kann selbst die Bundeskanzlei wenig ändern.

So ist es wirklich: irgendwer muss irgendwann das SIC-Konto der Bank gefüllt haben, sonst kann sie kein Geld wegüberweisen bzw. keinen Kredit vergeben. Aus nichts wird nichts: Jede Buchung hat zwei Seiten (schon mal von Soll und Haben gehört?) – das zu verbuchende Geld muss erst mal im Bankensystem sein. Banken können nicht hexen!

Anfangs waren 20.000 in der Kasse der Witwe Bolte; die zahlt 20.000 auf ein Sparbuch ein, die Bank vergibt damit einen Kredit an den Maserati-Fan Jugovic, der überweist das Geld seinem Autohändler, der zahlt es wiederum auf eine Bank ein, jetzt haben Frau Bolte und der Autohändler je 20.000, also zusammen 40.000 Bankguthaben und Jugovic hat 20.000 Schulden.

Es gibt netto immer noch gleich viel Geld (40.000 – 20.000 = 20.000, nicht mehr als Mme Bolte anfangs hatte.

Somit wird das Buchgeld durch die Kreditvergabe geschöpft, also der Geldumlauf erhöht, aber zwingend auf Basis einer Kundeneinlage.

Das Abstimmungsbüchlein sagt anfangs richtig, die Bank könne das Geld der Kundin verwenden. Es gibt aber nicht zweierlei Arten der Kreditvergabe – es gibt nur diese eine: Kundeneinlagen im Bankensystem werden als Kredite weitervergeben. Kredit “schafft” zusätzliches (Buch)Geld, also Guthaben, aber nicht grundlos, scheinbar aus dem Nichts.

Die “zweite” Methode ist somit exakt die erste, in unglücklichen Worten wiederholt.

Wenn die Bundeskanzlei nicht versteht, wie das Geldwesen funktioniert, wie soll es der Bürger kapieren, der darüber an der Urne befinden soll?

Neuseeland: habeas corpus out?

Please enable images for the best reading experience.

October 15, 2018
Bahia Beach, Puerto Rico

On June 15, 1215, King John sat in a field in Runnymede, England, surrounded by angry nobles.

His Barons—the big landowners throughout England—had rebelled and seized London, forcing King John to sign an agreement guaranteeing certain rights to the people of England… and restrictions of his power.

This agreement was called the Magna Carta. And it would become one of the most important documents in history.

Centuries later in 1678, Charles II was King of England. Like many kings, Charles was terrible with money.

And when he ran out of it, he started demanding extra taxes from his knights, and imprisoning those who refused to pay.

The King was once again surrounded by angry nobles, this time in the Parliament building. There he signed the writ of Habeas Corpus in exchange for more money.

Best tax dollars ever spent. Habeas Corpus said that government officials could not imprison people for no good reason. Prisoners had the right to go before a judge to determine if their imprisonment was justified.

Just because the government accused you of something didn’t mean they could do whatever they wanted to you.

About a hundred years later, American colonists got fed up with the King of England once again.

The government exists to serve the people, they said. If the government wants to accuse, search, or arrest you, they better have a good reason. And they better allow you every opportunity to clear your name.

In 1791, the Bill of Rights enshrined into law the right to speak out against officials, the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty, and to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure.

These concepts of individual rights were shaped in the UK and US. But they apply universally.

Unfortunately, some governments seem determined to erase all this progress.

If you’re traveling to New Zealand, you should be aware of the Customs and Excise Act of 2018. It just went into effect at the beginning of October.

New Zealand Customs and Border agents can now demand passwords for any electronic devices you bring into the country. They can download the entire contents of your phone or laptop, and search through it for evidence of a crime.

Agents could always search phones and laptops at the border. But now they can fine you up to $5,000 ($3,300 USD) for refusing to hand over the passwords, codes, and encryption keys to your devices.

The new law also allows Customs agents to collect biometric data from anyone entering the country. That means they can take your fingerprints, photo, or iris scans, store them, and share them.

And even worse, New Zealand’s Customs website explains:

“Making an arrest without a warrant can now be done with no limitation to timeframe.”

So now you officially have no rights at the New Zealand border.

Agents can search your electronics without cause, and fine you for refusing to give out your password. They can collect, store, and share any of your biometric data they want.

They can arrest you without a court order, and hold you for as long as they like.

It’s not like New Zealand is some third world country… They actually adopted the Habeas Corpus Act in 1881 while under British rule.

Along with the the UK, USA, Australia, and Canada, New Zealand’s legal system is part of the Western tradition. This is the legal basis, starting with the Magna Carta, that protects common people’s rights against overreaching authorities.

These countries also make up the Five Eyes intelligence alliance… They have all agreed to share secrets from their spy agencies with one another.

For a visualization of the Five Eyes Alliance, just look at a map of Oceania from George Orwell’s 1984—the dystopian classic portraying the ultimate authoritarian police state.

And unfortunately, New Zealand isn’t the only Five Eyes government acting like Big Brother—the embodiment of the omnipresent surveillance state in 1984.

Since 9/11 the US has also been searching travelers’ electronics at the border. But they kept the practice small scale for a while.

With the 9/11 terrorist attacks fresh, it didn’t really bother anyone. Anything in the name of national security…

But by 2015 Customs and Border Protection searched the electronic devices of 8,503 airline passengers throughout the year.

In 2016 it escalated to 19,033 searches.

And in 2017 Customs Agents searched the phones and laptops of 30,200 travelers.

Just like in New Zealand, agents didn’t get warrants for these searches. They didn’t even require probable cause.

In January of this year, US Customs sent out new guidance about phone and laptop searches at the border.

It says they can search anyone’s electronic devices “with or without suspicion.”

It says passengers are “obligated” to turn over their devices as well as passcodes for examination. If you refuse agents can seize the device.

That is all considered a “basic search.” No suspicion needed.

To add insult to injury, the January guidance starts, “CBP will protect the rights of individuals against unreasonable search and seizure and ensure privacy protection while accomplishing its enforcement mission.”

This is another page taken from Orwell. Doublethink. They want us to believe two contradictory ideas at the same time.

They treat everyone like a criminal, they say, to protect the innocent.

They search the innocent to protect their rights.

Habeas Corpus, the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure, the rights of the accused… these are quickly becoming lost to the memory hole of history.

To your freedom,

Signature

Simon Black,
Founder, SovereignMan.com

Pin It on Pinterest